Tank Girl, the revered ‘punk rock’ comic that’s currently undergoing a revival and inspired the 90’s-est movie possible, is infuriating to me. Initially written by Alan Martin and drawn by Jamie Hewlett (better known as the designer of Gorillaz’ visual style), it has since been worked on by a host of writers and artists. The hype surrounding it would lead a person to believe that it’s a force for feminism, and a brilliant, subversive, empowering, punk rock comic. The problem is, though, that Tank Girl is none of these things, and, what’s more, is almost entirely unreadable. It’s lazily written, poorly composed, and appeals constantly to the lowest possible common denominator.
To get an idea of the insufferable hype surrounding this comic, consider that Grant Morrison endorsed it by saying, “8 out of 10 cat owners who expressed a preference chose Hewlett and Martin as the voodoo sex-gods of the nineties.” Then read this incredible Wired article from December, 1994 about the then-imminent Tank Girl movie.
Now, I don’t want to be spitting bile without supporting my arguments, so I’ll concentrate my fire a bit.
For one thing, none of the characters in Tank Girl have any real character traits or development beyond one or two dimensions. Tank Girl is stupid, rude, and violent, her kangaroo boyfriend, the oh-so-hilariously-named Booga, is sensitive and clueless, everyone else is violent and stupid. Essentially, you could switch Tank Girl’s dialogue with almost any other character’s dialogue and there would be no noticeable difference.
Now, someone reading this critique might say, “the point of Tank Girl is that it’s over the top and stupid! It’s hilarious! Don’t you get it?” People seem to like Tank Girl for its humor, but let me say now that if I ever meet someone who tells me that they love Tank Girl’s humor, I will immediately ignore any other value judgment they give.
The Tank Girl humor formula is this:
-Someone makes a statement or asks a question
-Someone else sidetracks the initial statement/question
-There’s a rebuttal
-There’s a nonsensical and/or childish exclamation
So, for instance:
“Does anyone know whose barby this is?”
“Who cares? Soon as we get there we’ll just kill everyone!”
“Wow, we just don’t care, do we?”
“That’s because we’re kangaroos……..”
“I’m a kangaroo!”
“What’s a barby”
(Tank Girl Issue 1, Panel 4)
The other staple of Tank Girl humor is immature exclamations and swearing. And fat jokes. Oh, man, the writers of Tank Girl love fat jokes. The evil kangaroos in the first issue shout, “Run like hell fat people! We’ve all got chocolate bars on our heads!” In Tank Girl Odyssey, Tank Girl tells a companion who was revealed to have been wearing a corset to hide his flaws, “You don’t think we want a fat old balding shitter like you hanging around us? So long, loser.” I could find other examples, but I’ll ask you to take my word for it because reading Tank Girl makes me upset.
Basically, what I’m getting at is that Tank Girl has the sense of humor of a mean, stupid, 14-year-old boy. It entirely lacks subtlety in any form. Here’s a page that’s earnestly meant to represent character development in Tank Girl:
What’s more, Tank Girl has some of the most obnoxious walls of text I’ve ever seen in a comic. This problem seems to lessen as the series continues, but those early issues are all but unreadable because of the insanely poor composition and walls of text. Glance at this page.
Jamie Hewlett’s art is one of the best parts of the comic, but that’s faint praise. He’s a competent artist, clearly heavily influenced by Los Bros, but with none of their restraint. Every drawing in Tank Girl is dialed up to 11, which could look good on a punk flyer, but gets really tiring to read over a full issue.
Andy Pritchett, who took over pencils for Tank Girl Odyssey, does a good job of aping Hewlett’s style, but only to a point. Some of his panel-to-panel transitions are mystifying. Take a look at these panels and tell me what the fuck happens to the beer she squeezed out of the can. Does she drink it? Does it fall on the floor? We’ll never know.
There are moments like this repeatedly throughout Tank Girl, where I would stop and say, “what the fuck just happened?” Pritchett is a competent artist, but pretty clearly limited and unedited. And only good at drawing his own characters, take a look at this page where he reveals his complete inability to draw real people:
Any guesses on who that last one is supposed to be? Give up? It’s Jim Morrison.
In conclusion, Tank Girl is a piece of shit comic with so few redeeming qualities as to render its continuing popularity inexcusable. Reading so much of it to write this review was a mistake.
And the revival? Behold a comic so unfunny that it would make Archie roll his eyes in apathetic disgust.
__________
Click here for the Anniversary Index of Hate.









37 Comments
There seem to be at least 3 illos missing from this post.
Aw crap…let me check….
All right; illustrations are in. I don’t know what happened; I definitely uploaded them and placed them. Stupid wordpress….
the only reason to flip through tank girl is the hot kangaroo men.
I have to admit, I rather like Tank Girl, and really enjoyed the movie, which was good campy fun (maybe not quite up there with Flash Gordon, but still.)
Jacob’s analysis of the humor seems about right…but not necessarily bad for that. It’s a formula, but a decent formula. Or it works for me, anyway.
i think any pleasure can possibly be derived from all of tank girl’s formula and aesthetic can be found in a more inventive, skillful, funny and interesting way in a single page of King City.
Can I just say that Jamie Hewlett’s drawings start out kind of crude, but they improve quickly and by the end, it’s world-class cartooning. King City doesn’t come close.
Noah, you are a fuckin’ mystery.
I try!
Noah:
“All right; illustrations are in. I don’t know what happened; I definitely uploaded them and placed them. Stupid wordpress…”
As you know, Noah, I loves me some wordpress…but damn, that’s one buggy platform. I remember my shrieks of horror when WP decided, for no apparent reason, that my 3000-word post on architecture and comics should be exclusively in italics. Other times WP has decreed ALL CAPITALS….
Jacob, after the civilised critique of ‘Stitches’ that preceded you, thanks for restoring the venom and horror appropriate for the Anniversary of Hate!
I’ve always loathed Tank Girl. I thought it was a clueless and cynical attempt to exploit the Punk ethic.
Hey, those walls of captions? They were made all the more insufferable because of the truly incompetent, hideous, blindness-causing lettering. But ‘ey, vat’s de punk way, innit?
I overload on the effing and blinding, too. Cheap way to attain street cred in the UK.
(The most filthy-mouthed US gangsta rapper is as a Victorian schoolmistress compared to the average working-class Brit oik.)
Thank you for calling shit, shit.
Yeah that Odyssey story has some of the most completely nonsensical panel transitions, camera angles and page compositions I’ve ever had the misfortune to behold. And don’t get me started on those irritating “editorial asides” where the artist inserts grotesque caricatures of himself and the writer commenting on the “action”…and I never understood why Hewlett is so revered. “Hewligans Haircut” was great, really daft psychedelic Python insanity with art to match but I’m totally with you on Tank Girl…in fact I first read it this year when it was virtually forced upon me by a friend, one of the early collections and The Odyssey, urgh,never again, son, never again….great article.
Martin: We may have this disagreement on the level of technique, but at the end of the day for me, reading Tank Girl makes me feel bad and discouraged while reading King City makes me feel good and want to draw more. Hewlett’s art, however spectacular, is polish on a crude and rickety foundation.
AB – “I thought it was a clueless and cynical attempt to exploit the Punk ethic.” THIS
i may have a personal stake in this, but i grew up nurtured by the hardcore/edge scene and have always felt that the glorification (and commodification) of filth and reckless unthinking aggression from within and without punk culture was a travesty.
though the “scene” i mention was a miniscule pocket of queer marxist gentlehearted posi punks in a sea of dumb male aggro edge
fwiw, it’s the rich text editor that is the problem in WP. I use the html editor and I never have trouble. Rich text editors (all of them really) are problematic.
Martin, we settle this at dawn. CHOOSE YOUR WEAPON.
Perhaps because people think of comics in terms of characters first and foremost, I think when Tank Girl first appeared in Deadline, readers were excited at the explosive emergence of a talented young cartoonist, and mistook that excitement for thinking Tank Girl, the character, was anything special. A bit like mistaking enjoying the atmosphere and energy at a punk gig for thinking the songs are any good. Philip Bond’s Wired World was the best strip in Deadline anyway.
Michael, I totally agree with you about King City. I think that there is a place for silly or sidetracking humor in comics, especially when it’s as excellently executed as it is by Brandon Graham. Graham’s art is less representative, maybe, but I love it for its fluidity, something that Tank Girl lacks.
AB: Haha, thank you, I’m glad you like it. I was worried about being too mean, but I dove into the spirit of the anniversary wholeheartedly. And Michael, I felt the same way about the characterization of punk as gross and shitty. It, like many aspects of Tank Girl, just comes across as lazy.
Ant, I’ve never read Hewligan’s Haircut, but I want to now.
Patrick, I was thinking along similar lines. I’m sure that Tank Girl WAS something novel for a lot of Deadline’s readers, and I could see it holding a lot of promise, especially at first.
Of course it’s worse than Los Bros! Everything, including your mother is worse than them!
Derik, I think it’s less that Noah is a mystery and more that he isn’t terrified to admit he likes something the stereotypical comics literati doesn’t or wouldn’t.
“Derik, I think it’s less that Noah is a mystery and more that he isn’t terrified to admit he likes something the stereotypical comics literati doesn’t or wouldn’t.”
Well, that’s the charitable interpretation. My taste could just be completely incoherent, would be the less generous take….
I like the pages in this post… Though I guess I can understand how page after page of this might get old. You can’t take the movie away from me, though.
Going by these pages, Tank Girl is not a person but a “muse” who lives in the writer’s head? How much you enjoy Tank Girl depends on how much you can sympathize with having voices in your head? Particularly voices that are sexual, primative, cruel and/or not impressed with you? I haven’t read the comic, I’m just asking.
—————–
michael (funnyanimalbooks) says:
Hewlett’s art, however spectacular, is polish on a crude and rickety foundation.
—————–
Fair enough! I bought those “Tank Girl” comics too, but solely ’cause the Hewlett-rendered TG looked so darn…cute.
But sheesh, everything else about the comic grated. Especially TG’s personality. All chain-smoking, gun-shooting, and “edgy.” Are punk girls expected to be all irritating, destructive assholes?
To a lesser degree of noxiousness, consider Hopey; one of the most inexplicably popular characters — among fans and others in the comic — ever. (Come to think of it, Maggie is quite a big bore, too; what does she have going for her, “ordinariness-power”?)
Speaking of the variety of artists who worked on the title, anyone recall Ashley Wood’s “corporate look” Tank Girl? http://coilhouse.net/2007/12/tank-girl-then-and-now/
Without really finding fault in Jacob’s analysis, I’d say that this is exactly why TG is fun. For me in small bites. And never was meant to be substantive or subtle or anything like that.
It’s mocking the cheese of media, the in your face of counter culture, and the brutal but still romantic notions the west had about some kind of post-apocalyptic world we expected for ourselves as reflected in the Mad Max movies and all the rest like that. What it took from punk was being totally transgressive. And yeah, punk girls who were really all out about it in the 80s were frankly abrasive and unpleasant. never did end up dating any of them. Way too likely they would end up puking in you lap by way of making a pass.
Tank Girl said, look, this is ALL, really stupid. All of this. And yet you still think she’s hot. You’re stupid. Congratulations, you’re human. Now here’s a stupid kangaroo joke.
Subdee: I don’t think Martin/Hewlitt were going for anything so profound, really. They were two young guys writing something they found funny and kind of transgressive. Based on everything I’ve read, I don’t think they were trying to delve into some deeper philosophical point with Tank Girl.
Salgood Sam: I’d like to believe what you’re saying, but I really can’t. I think it’s totally earnest, really. If there is irony it’s indistinguishable from earnestness. And when Martin gives interviews about the early days saying, “We had about a month to create each part, so of course we’d leave it until five days until the deadline and then we’d stay up all night. I’d be filling in the boxes as soon as Jamie had completed the drawings. A lot of the time we wouldn’t know how it was going to end until Jamie started drawing the final panel.” it doesn’t really lead me to think that there was any greater meta-narrative in mind at any point. Just two guys making cool, violent comics about PUNK, MAN!
(full interview here, btw: http://www.sci-fi-online.com/Interview/02-11-22_AlanMartin.htm)
Hewlett, sorry. Constantly misspelling his name.
Hewlett is much better off with the Gorillaz gig. I saw his Monkey King show he designed. Wonderful stuff.
TG is probably just a remote nightmare of juvenile striving by now.
‘Deadline’ was a courageous venture, but it indulged too readily in stupid crap. There is no nation on Earth more anxious to appear cool and hip than the English; it’s probably a transposition of class anxiety.
Yeah, it featured some good strips, notably ‘Hugo Tate’ by Nick Abadzis. But most of the ‘zine was given over to posturing by morons.
For me, the low point came in 1992, when the mag despatched some hapless semi-literate to Paris in anticipation of the opening of the Channel Tunnel. His report was full of the usual Brit xenophobic lies (Frenchmen all stink of garlic, etc), capped by the utterly imbecilic remark that Paris was a crap city because it had only two Indian restaurants.
At that time, Paris had over TWO HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE Indian restaurants.
Tosser.
Tosser magazine. Stay dead, Deadline.
[...] Hooded Utilitarian just published my hate-filled essay about Tank Girl as part of their “Anniversary of Hate!” you can read it here! [...]
Tank Girl started as an ad for a comic which didn’t exist, and (in my opinion) the majority of the character’s popularity exists apart, and perhaps despite, the actual strip.
Tank Girl’s popularity arises from being appropriated for a thousand punk flyers, t-shirts and as a lesbian punk mascot during the protests of England’s Clause 28.
The initial strip had an anti-narrative aesthetic akin to Gary Panter and, in my opinion, only worked within the context of Deadline. I agree all the attempts to cash in on it as a more normal comic book or movie are increasingly cynical, obnoxious failures.
Yet not recognizing this divergence between the appropriated images and comics and movie which tried to mine this popularity makes this hate essay rather empty. Without this context, the essay comes of as expecting a linear work where none existed.
So Tank Girl was great for half a second and then got appropriated and dumbed down and almost everyone who likes it doesn’t really get it?
That’s so punk rock.
Apologies as I see some of this is mentioned in the interview linked in your comment. Overall I think it’s possible for something to be intentionally meta and still lazy and bad. I think the part you quote indicates how non-earnest the enterprise was – at least not until it became successful enough to be a long term product.
Noah: more like the appropriation made it into something more interesting and meaningful than the original tossed off content. Which is somewhat latter days punk rock. I mean, pictures of Lori Petty as Tank Girl have a quality that is entirely detached from that hole of a movie.
Oh i don’t think it was any more planed than 99% of the rest of the stupid stuff done in the name of Punk. I agree the interview just proves that. But what i said is how it spoke to fans like me. Why despite all that one can find fault with, it was funny and enjoyable. Never was something so blindingly dumb, drawn so well.
I don’t know, I get what you’re saying, Tyrone, but I don’t think it’s unreasonable to judge a work as ‘linear’ when it’s being sold to me as such. I wasn’t in England during the protests of Clause 28, I never read Deadline, etc, but neither has the majority of Tank Girl’s fanbase, I’d wager. When a work like Tank Girl is presented by its original creators in ways like this: http://www.fpnyc.com/Hole-of-Tank-Girl-Slipcased-HC-Collected-Edition/9780857687449/Graphic-Novels/111270/Titan-Books it doesn’t seem at all unreasonable to judge it as its presented.
It’s one thing to argue that it’s stupid and fun. That’s a personal judgment that I strongly disagree with, but can’t take away from you. I don’t buy, though, that it would totally make sense if only I’d held Deadline in my hands and then I would get it. I’m only able to judge this book in the ways it’s presented.
“I don’t buy, though, that it would totally make sense if only I’d held Deadline in my hands and then I would get it. I’m only able to judge this book in the ways it’s presented.”
Deadline was the way it was presented — at least the prime years of it. As short bursts of fun in a disposable magazine. “You had to be there” and you weren’t. It’s OK, mate.
Meh, whatever. It is still better than about 90% of the other garbage the fanboys are reading.
wow your art and comic must be greatly revered and highly sought after in the publishing community. this critique can be summed up as “I think Alan Martin and Jamie Helwett smell funny”. what kind of real world reject/art school graduate are you if your argument is based off of off beat british punk humor and panels? if there’s something missing in a panel use your imagination. If you can’t grasp the anarchic style and humor stick to the simplistic and mind numbingly boring dry comics of marvel or DC. Do you also hate “SCUD: the disposable assassin”? or monty python, or about anything that was about dick and fart jokes. I bet you asked for your money back after watching clerks because you thought black and white was pretentious and the lines didn’t sound fluid.
That was sheer bloody-minded foolery. Come on, everyone is entitled to judge a work of art.