So; Wonder Woman #196-200, Greg Rucka’s first few issues on the title, I think, with art by Drew Johnson and Ray Snyder.
Wonder Woman publishes a book filled with wisdom. We don’t get to hear much of that wisdom in detail, but apparently she thinks peace is good, eating meat is bad for the environment, and you should support your local U.N. The comics, in other words, are kind of like listening to World View, except with all the actual information about world events replaced with platitudes and remarkably poorly rendered, unstylish art. It can also be distinguished from World View because it has less action. Wonder Woman wanders around to signings and readings while a shadowy, nefarious organization attempts to…ruin her reputation! Like in Legends! Remember Legends! Except, this time, instead of Darkseid, we’ve got some blandly blond executive type and Dr. Psycho. Not the Marston version with ectoplasm and kinky hypnotism. No, this is a tedious, latter-day version who does nothing for five issues and finally is unleashed at the end to…start a mild riot, which the police break up by themselves without even Wonder Woman’s help. That’s because Wonder Woman is engaged in a by-the-numbers slugfest with Silver Swan. Who apparently is the tortured, mind-twisted Vanessa Kapetelis, the teen Mary Sue from George Perez’s run on the title. I presume the obligatory desecration of Vanessa isn’t Rucka’s fault. Still, it does suck that every minor character, no matter how innocent, has to eventually show up as a super-villain. It sort of makes you think that the people writing this stuff don’t actually have more than two ideas to rub together.
Who the fuck wants to read this crap? Whose idea of a hero is a NPR commentator in a swimsuit? Rucka just seems endlessly fascinated by how busy WW is; how she’s racing from one do-gooding enterprise to another. The supporting characters are mostly her staff, because, damn it, social secretaries are fascinating. The series often feels like a journalistic puff piece from a fashion magazine or something; it’s like WW is Angelina Jolie. And I know that lots of folks like to read about Angelina Jolie and her doings, sure. But Jolie exists; why do you want to invent her? I can understand the appeal of Twilight; I can understand the appeal of Superman; I can understand the appeal of the Marston Wonder Woman, who was fun because she had amazing adventures and exciting powers. But Wonder Woman as ersatz, earnest celebrity? For God’s sake, why?
In fact, to see how wrong-minded this approach is, you don’t have to go any farther than the back-up features in WW #200, an annual sized volume. A short story by Robert Rodi with art by Rick Burchett called “Golden Age” essentially retells Rucka’s story in the style of Marston/Peter. And — despite the fact that artist Rick Burchett disgraces himself in trying to imitate Peter, and despite the fact that Rodi is unwilling to fully embrace Marston’s bondage fetish — the result is delightful. We ditch the leaden plot, and instead rush blithely from enjoyably ridiculous complication to enjoyably ridiculous action feat. WW refuses to endorse Veronica Callow’s perfume, so Callow builds a super-robot which imitates WW and performs numerous evil deeds (painting a moustache on the statue of liberty! kissing Steve Trevor!) WW despairs as her friends turn against her…but then, with the help of Etta Candy, she uncovers the dastardly deeds…and convinces the robot to turn to the good! And at the end the goddess Aphrodite appears and turns the robot into a real girl. WW sum up by noting that she defeated the robot with “my powers of persuasion! That’s all any girl needs to be a Wonder Woman!” By this point, anyone willing to satirize Rucka is okay in my book…and, as a bonus, we also get to see one of the Amazon kangaroos, lost for many years in the seas of continuity.
This is one of the only bondage scenes in the story (the villain is tied up at the end. Artist Rick Burchett gets Peter’s stiff poses, more or less, but Peter’s fluid linework not so much. The motion lines for the spanking for example, are uniform weight, simple boring strokes, clumsily positioned. No way would Peter draw them that way.
Again, this doesn’t actually read like it’s by somebody who really understand, or likes, or even read the Marston/Peter run that closely. Having WW’s friends turn on her and the anxiety about kissing Steve — that’s way, way Silver Age. Marston’s WW would never cut and run back to Paradise Island…and no way would Marston’s Steve reject a kiss from WW. But that’s neither here nor there; the point is that this is silly, action-filled fun, with the central messages (persuade, don’t fight! women power, yay!) presented with tongue-in-cheek, perhaps, but still with less pomposity and greater clarity than in Rucka. If they published a WW comic like this now, I’d probably have to buy it, even if the art did suck this badly.
(There’s also a moderately entertaining silver age story called “Amazon Women on the Moon” which is about what is says (by Nunzio Defilippis and Chistina Weir with actually competent art by Ty Templeton). And then there’s an adequate retelling of the Perseus legend by Greg Rucka. And hopefully that’s the last Greg Rucka I’ll read for quite some time.)
_______________
For those who want more Rucka-bashing, I made fun of the Hiketeia here.
I wonder if Peter used a brush. Do you know?
The flat ink lines in this one look very mechanical to me. No life and movement.
I'm going to have to check out the kangaroo. Amazon kangaroos are so much cooler than any of that weird politico shit.
I think he must have, right? That would be my guess, anyway.
I think the political shit would be acceptable if they could somehow make kangaroos a part of it. If she were advocating for kangaroo suffrage, for instance, I think that would win me over.
I warned you to avoid Rucka…I assume you know he's currently writing lesbian superheroines in Detective Mag. (starring Batwoman for the nonce). The art (by J.H. Williams III) is pretty kewl–but I still couldn't bring myself to buy it
Bryan sent them to me for free, so what could I do?
"I presume the obligatory desecration of Vanessa isn't Rucka's fault. "
I assume it is his fault, or at least its his fault for not quietly retconning it. I think I read a Superman comic he wrote around the same time where the Toyman or Pranskter is a serial killing lunatic but from his insane point of view everything is fun and silver agey, so Rucka must like this stuff.
(It's funny to me, because it appears to be watered down Alan Moore "Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow" stuff, but Moore parodied his own trope later in Tomorrow Stories, having First American write a bad fan fiction about his sidekick where "All of the comedy villains are now serial killers!" and that's all I think of these days if someone attempts this sort of thing)
I think your sort of misrepresenting Rucka though, he's all about social awareness, so I think he's trying to make Wonder Woman something of a political activist, and its not fair to just describe her as being a celebrity. I think the villains were kind of right wingers or something, but I lost interest pretty quickly and never got very far in his run, the book was a multiple personality mess, he was trying to do the political thing but these wacky unrelated greek Gods plotlines kept coming out left field, it was really lame.
Rucka is often trying to work in political stuff, like on Queen and Country with the Taliban, or Lois Lane covering the fake Afgan War, or wolverine fighting Militia groups in America.
His Wonder-woman is not good, but I think its an honest attempt at social relevancy (I liked the realism in his first Wolverine arc, but didn't stick around for his second. Queen and Country is pretty good. his Superman was pretty awful.)
"Rucka is often trying to work in political stuff, like on Queen and Country with the Taliban"
Q&C is the only stuff of his I've read. A point I want to make, which is only tangential to your point, is that Q&C claimed that al-Qaeda was in league with Iraq. That may have been later than the Taliban arc, I don't remember, but it doesn't surprise me that Noah finds Rucka's WW stories so dumb.
Q&C had very good British-style dialogue and very well-engineered pages, but the stories/characterization weren't much good, imo. and the politics were a bit flimsy.
"Rucka is often trying to work in political stuff"
Yeah; that's why I compared him to NPR commentators and Angelina Jolie. Angelina Jolie really seems like the best comparison; she's a celebrity *and* politically engaged!
You're right about blaming him for Vanessa, I guess. I was trying to give him the benefit of the doubt, but why bother?
Sort of an aside, but speaking of Rucka and politics, are you aware he apparently thought that playboy showing a nude wonder-woman was an anti-feminist plot to try to stop Hillary Clinton from being president and set back the women's liberation movement?
(eh, can't figure out how to link right)
http://ruckawriter.livejournal.com/31761.html
(Actually, that sounds like a pretty funny tongue in cheek Wonder Woman story idea)
Yeah, I knew that he got very upset about that playboy cover. I talk about the cover myself here