Marston and Peter’s Wonder Woman 16 may have been the best of the run so far, both in terms of the unusually ominous story and the adventurous art. #17 starts out well, with a marvelous cover.
Peter uses almost all of his favorite tricks here: the bison is out of scale, so WW looks almost like a doll, and even the horse seems bizarrely tiny. The motion lines are incredibly dynamic…in part because the circle is split up, I think. He also uses some of his scribbly linework for the bison’s breath…and that little cue cartoony squirrel is hard to resist. Plus, it looks like we’re going to get WW in the wild west, which sounds like it has potential. The last time travel episode, with evolving gorillas and dinosaurs and Steve turning into a cave man, was pretty great, so I was optimistic that a second might work as well.
Unfortunately, after that cover, the issue itself is pretty much…eh. Part of the problem is that the entire plot is built around a scientist Lana, her love for the no-good Carl, and WW and the Holiday girls’ efforts to cure her of same. Lana’s confusion is such that it causes her to whip up time winds which cause all and sundry to fall back into the past and relive former lives in roman and colonial times…but even such full-bore nuttiness can’t disguise the fact that this is a pretty staid man-done-her-wrong plot. Marston’s fetishes are kept mostly under wraps (as it were); Lana triumphs simply by getting rid of the bad guy in her life, not by teaching him the joys of bondage and loving submission. The feminism is less conflicted, but also a good bit duller. Or maybe the problem is just that pure, naive Lana is not a particularly sparkling protagonist; whether as modern scientist, Roman maiden, or pioneer daughter, her trust in her blandly evil boyfriend and love for her blandly gruff father are equally uninvolving. You can see why Marston didn’t care enough about her to even bother tying her up.
As is often the case in this series, as Marston goes, so goes Peter; the artist doesn’t seem nearly as inspired as in his last couple of outings. Still, there are a couple of moments. The duo does some more experimenting with wordless action sequences, and again the effect is lovely:
This is an interesting moment too.
Wonder Woman is using a pole to pick up a fan so the blades can cut the ropes tying Etta. I’m not sure the sequence entirely works; it’s hard to figure out whether WW is supposed to be moving up or down in that first panel, and the way the image is cropped, cutting off the end of the pole and the bottom two-thirds of Etta, seems awkward. But, again, I like the experiment with wordlessness, and the use of mutliple, Flash-like images of WW to convey motion is intriguing. Again, I wonder if this is something we’ll see more of in future issues. (I know we’ll see more of bound WW manipulating objects with her teeth — Marston lives for that.)
Going into the past also allows Etta to fully embrace her butchness:
Yep; in a past life, Etta was a gun-toting madam…er, that is, cantina owner. I like this intimation of jealousy as well:
Peter also makes Etta rather handsome there. The borderline men’s attire suits her. (More evidence that Marston doesn’t necessarily see women in drag as evil.
And…yeah, I think that’s really about all I’ve got to say here. You can tell the issue wasn’t firing on all cylinders because I’m not having to stifle the impulse to reproduce every single page. Peter’s art is still worth looking at, but there’s little evidence here of the breath-taking double page layouts that made last issue so stunning. But that’s the way it goes sometimes. We’ll see hope for better on the next one….
great bit of art to see on a sunday morning, appreciated …
No problem! Always nice to hear someone is appreciating Harry Peter….
That's really rather disappointing, considering the cover. I haven't gotten there yet in my WW reading, but I always love to see Peter draw animals. He has such a way with them.
Harry Peter has become the real reason to read this; Marston is a fascinating figure, to be sure, but there's a real sense that his obsessions don't really develop over all these installments, and there will always be an inscrutability to the content that resists any attempt to make sense of it (not that the last part is a complaint, mind you).
Peter though — it seems like every issue there's an odd bit of technique and style that suggests some crazy alternate world where these books were a significant part of the genre's development. Especially reading that long comment thread on Jog's site about Batman and Robin #3 and how action comics are staged and read, this seems interestinng, not in terms of thematics, but mechanics – that buffalo page — you know.
VM, if you're reading through the collections, you may well never get here; I don't think they've collected this far yet, and whether they will or not is anybody's guess. (They do seem to be moving forward on reissuing WW in various formats, but whether they'll get all of them out at any point…I just don't know.)
nrh…could you link to that thread? I'm interested to see it.
Also…I think attributing the art and layout, etc., entirely to Peter is probably not quite right. Marston was very involved in layout and design I think (he hired Peter himself, after all.) And my sense is that Peter's art more or less fell off a cliff after Marston died (not certain that that's true; haven't seen it myself yet.) This is not to take anything away from Peter at all, who is a shockingly inventive and exciting artist…but I think particularly in terms of cartooning and action narrative and so forth, Marston was probably involved as well (I very much doubt it was Peter's decision alone to do wordless sequences, for example.)
http://joglikescomics.blogspot.com/2009/09/im-here-im-tired-im-behind.html
That's the initial post (where he makes some comments at the bottom that the comments thread continues to discuss, and Jog goes to pretty great length discussing why he wrote what he did).
And hey, the newest post is a Junko Mizuno review, so it's a great time to stop by anyway.
Has anyone seen an original script by Marston?
I was wondering if there were any original scripts by Marston as well. Les Daniels doesn't reproduce any in his book, I don't think. Whether any exist at all…I just don't know.
Noah, have you thought about reviewing the 1980s Trina Robbin's WW miniseries? Looks like she was going for the HG Peter vibe….
Not only have I not thought of reviewing it, I've never even heard of it! I see Kurt Busiek was the writer. I'd certainly be interested in reading it….
I remember the ad for it stated "A fond look back at the original Wonder Woman." Looks like Trina made sure she was bound at least once.