This first appeared on Splice Today.
_______________________
Of all the pre-processed, artificial, talentless pop blow-up dolls, Britney Spears is quite possibly the most processed, the most artificial, and the most talentless. Beyoncé can actually sing. Lady Gaga has performance art attitude. K$sha has rock and roll attitude. Rihanna has an accent. Even the relatively anonymous Ciara can dance.
In comparison, Britney is a cipher. Over the years, she’s mimicked a range of pop styles, from the faux-Beatles psychedelia of 1999’s “The Beat Goes On,” to the 2001 faux-Prince funk of “Boys.” But you never get the sense that those styles exactly influenced her, or that she even knows who Prince or the Beatles are. Without Michael Jackson, Justin Timberlake’s whole performance schtick would dissolve. Without Prince or the Beatles or even Madonna, Britney’s producers would just feed her something else. This is ludicrously illustrated in 2007’s Blackout, where whoever’s in charge decides to turn Britney into a confessional artist. On “Piece of Me” she coos and growls about her public meltdown and her kid and how unfair everyone is to her, and she sounds as engaged as if she’s reading someone else’s tax forms. When Christina Aguilera whines about her critics, she seems sincerely self-obsessed. For Britney, though, talking about her life is just another pose she can fail to carry off convincingly.
Which is absolutely not a bad thing. On the contrary, Britney’s utter lack of emotional investment in her own music has served her well throughout her career. The contrast with Xtina is instructive. Aguilera has 10 times the voice Britney does. But she also has at least that much more ambition, without any more discernible intelligence. Her increasingly desperate efforts to turn herself into something more respectable than a dumb pop singer—a classic diva! Lady Gaga! Anything! Help!—have resulted in one of the most embarrassing public careers in recent memory. For Xtina followers, her mangling of the national anthem wasn’t so much a horrible misstep as a logical culmination of her evolution as a singer. And I’m speaking as someone who liked Aguilera’s last album!
Britney’s had her own public disasters, of course. But they never seemed to touch her actual music, in large part because nothing touches her music. A Britney song has the perfect purity of an unwrapped Twinkie; it exists outside authenticity and time and art in an inviolable envelope of plastic. This has only become truer as her career as advanced. Way back on Baby, One More Time, Britney sounded almost human—on the first moans of that album she even came within a mortar shot of soul. No fear of that on the recently released Femme Fatale. Autotune was made for Britney and Britney for autotune. Her non-personality is systematically erased; she’s more herself than ever, which is to say she’s more no one.
Just because Femme Fatale is arguably Britney’s most characteristic album doesn’t necessarily mean it’s her best. The song selection overall certainly isn’t as strong as In the Zone, and I think Femme Fatale is a step down from her last effort, 2008’s Circus, as well. Still, there’s plenty to like. From the insanely catchy whistled hook of “I Wanna Go,” to the catchy and burpy low end on “Big Fat Bass,” producers Dr. Luke, Martin, Billboard and others pack the disc with enough gimmicks for an ABBA album or three. The sing-song girl-meets-bloop “How I Roll” does Robyn better than Robyn does. “I wanna go downtown where my posse’s at / got nine lives like a kitty cat,” turns streetwise posturing into music-box girl-group nonsense, an apotheosis of rapturously treacly yearning. But the highlight of studio fuckery may come on “(Drop Dead) Beautiful.” In the middle of casually objectifying some hot guy, Britney lets out a lascivious laugh which is almost instantly processed into a computerized squeal. It’s like the producers heard a flicker of sincere emotion and panicked. Drown it out! Drown it out! Where’s the confounded FX knob?
The totality of the self-effacement on Britney’s albums is definitely funny, arguably disturbing—and also, I think, kind of moving. For instance, at the beginning of “Inside Out,” Britney sings “gotta look my best if we’re gonna breakup.” It’s a wry, rather sad line, and it seems true as well—you want to impress the boyfriend more when he’s on the way out, though logically you should want to less. The lyric touches on a sense of being out of control, of trying to remake yourself to no good purpose.
I don’t think this is a glimpse of the real Britney. Someone else wrote it, and her delivery certainly doesn’t suggest she thought about it too hard. Rather, the lyric resonates with the fact that there is no real Britney. And that in turn points to a sometimes-neglected truth. Pop and love and life—they’re not just about swagger and personality. They’re also about disappearing into everyone and no one; about ominous, bitter, and sometimes sweet nothings. Britney is not the pop star as genius. But there is a kind of genius in the way she incarnates the pop star as nonentity.
I like this. Thanks.
“A Britney song has the perfect purity of an unwrapped Twinkie; it exists outside authenticity and time and art in an inviolable envelope of plastic.” = COOL.
You’re welcome! Thanks for commenting; it’s nice to have somebody read it.
I’d say that Blackout and Femme Fatale are two of the only pop albums that I can listen to from start to finish… That’s not to say that I think Britney is a great musician or anything like that (but then again – who really knows? Maybe she is) – but she does have a talent (or luck) with working with the right people – reckon you put your finger on something that part of that is because of – in parts of how much of a “nonentity” she is.
However – saying all that – I do realise that there is some sort of latent sexism hidden in these comments. Female musicians always get discussed in a way that assumes that there must be a man at the controls somewhere – while male musicians get all the credit for themselves. Eg everyone tends to agree that M Jackson was a genius – while Britney – not so much. (Oh well).
The sexism point is worth making…though I think there are other female pop stars who seem much more in control of their music than Britney. Mariah Carey writes her own songs, for example, and obviously has a much stronger musical voice (in various senses.) Beyonce, too, seems to have a fair amount of musical input. On the other hand, Justin Timberlake…I think he’s definitely really dependent on his producers (more than Mariah, for example.)
Yeah. Agree with the Justin comment. Mariah – not so much (but maybe that’s just because I don’t ever really listen to much Mariah?)
This reminds me of this: http://pitchfork.com/news/27349-mia-confronts-the-haters/ (I’m not always M.I.A.s biggest fan – but she makes some good points).
That’s odd about M.I.A.; I’d always thought of her as being pretty much in control of her own music. I didn’t realize there was a meme that she wasn’t.
Like I said, Mariah writes a lot of her own material and has a pretty distinctive sound…you can dislike her or like her, but she’s got much more of a consistent musical personality than Britney does, I think.
Is “consistent musical personality” the target tho? I mean I could name a whole bunch of folks/bands who have made their mark by NOT having a consistent musical personality and changing their style from album to album to album….
Well, Mariah’s done that too to some extent. But changing personality is also a personality — it means you’re edgy and adventurous (i.e. Neil Young.)