The Spy Who Waded About in the Bullshit

This ran a long ways back at Splice Today.
___________

200px-JohnLeCarre_TheSpyWhoCameInSomehow, I had thought that John Le Carré’s The Spy Who Came In From the Cold was an unflinching look at the idiocy of the cold war era — a spy novel for people who hated not just James Bond, but John F. Kennedy.

Alas, the book in my head was far, far better than the book that ended up in my hands. I had hoped for acerbic wit; what I got instead was maudlin tripe.

Admittedly, Le Carré’s book has superficial differences from Fleming’s here-I-come-to-save-the-world! cheerleading. Alec Leamas is not your typical manly-man. Basically a rumpled bureaucrat, he spends most of the book semi-undercover as a no-account boozing wastrel. His main spy skill is not fighting powers or seductive charm, but the ability to lie convincingly for surprisingly extended periods of time.

And yet, on closer look, Leamas starts to seem not so different from Bond after all. It’s true that he only gets into one or two fights — but the book details his brutal competence in those encounters with crisp, matter-of-fact smugness. And yes, he only sleeps with one girl — but that relationship is wearisomely familiar. Liz, library assistant and idealistic Communist party member, is pure and good and loving, and she falls in love with Alec instantly and for no reason except that he’s so darn deep. Leamas loves her too, and the book pivots around that mutual love without ever providing one iota of evidence that it exists. Declarations of eternal devotion come out of nowhere and are attached to nothing. Liz and Alec are in love not because they like each other, or make each other laugh, or even know jack shit about each other. Rather, they’re in love because Le Carré has a plot to push along, and this is the best he could do.

Thematically, Liz is supposed to contrast with the evil machinations of the spy network. She’s sentimental and good; the service is realistic and bad. The final pages of the novel (following the Shocking Twist Ending that I figured out halfway through the book) are given over to a heartfelt argument between Liz and Leamas. “[T]hey…find the humanity in people…and…turn it like a weapon in their hands, and use it to hurt and kill—“ Liz fulminates with naïve moralism. “What else have men done since the world began?” Leamas responds with world-weary cynicism. “I don’t believe in anything don’t you see — not even destruction or anarchy.”

Thus are the battle lines laid down…though, appropriately for a spy novel, I suppose, it’s pretty much impossible to tell the one side from the other. Liz and Leamas are equally earnest, equally humorless, and equally committed to vapid Hollywood philosophizing. Ostensibly their conversation reveals the evils of spying and exposes the despicable practices of the Cold War warriors. In fact, though, their sodden disillusionment is indistinguishable from slack-jawed reverence. “The spies…,” they seem to cry in unison, “oh, Lord, they’re so diabolical, so vicious! They do such dirty work out there beyond the bounds of morality, use such subtle tricks, that normal people just fall to pieces before them. How can we parse the questions they raise? How can we live in this horrible world? What, oh what, shall we do?”

Back in the real world, of course, most major espionage activities look more like farce than anything else. I mean, the Bay of Pigs? Oliver North? Accidentally murdering suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay and then removing the corpses’ throats because, hyuk! hyuk!, gee nobody’ll notice that? Clearly, the real secret of intelligence is that these people aren’t Machiavellian geniuses. They’re bumbling shitheads, just like most government functionaries — or, for that matter, most people.

Joseph Conrad had this figured out in The Secret Agent. Not Le Carré though. He believes in the hard truths, which is the same thing as saying that he’s a credulous sucker for melodrama. Leamas sacrifices himself for love, because, damn it, that’s what spies do. Le Carré’s heroes care so much they barter their souls, a formulation which cleverly elides the fact that in truth said heroes couldn’t find their own asses, much less their souls, with both hands and a $50,000 government-procured state-of-the-art GPS tracking system.

10 thoughts on “The Spy Who Waded About in the Bullshit

  1. Uh…okay. How so?

    I genuinely hated it. I thought it would be worthwhile, since everyone seems to like it, but it’s really boneheaded, poorly conceived crap. I would have been much happier if it weren’t, but it would have been bad faith to pretend I thought it was mediocre, much less good.

  2. The only Le Carré I’ve read is Looking Glass War, which is pretty much the opposite of your description of Spy Who Came In From The Cold. It’s a spy novel about the pointlessness of espionage and the callous incompetence of government agents. I can’t say it’s a great book but it’s plenty good, and it’s more like the book you were expecting.

  3. Hmm, actually a lot of people who have read The Spy Who Came in From the Cold also see it as being about the “pointlessness of espionage” (since the guy is betrayed by both sides). So I don’t think you should read more Le Carre to be honest – an exercise in futility?

    So read Tinker, Tailor before? That’s more about bureaucracy, incompetence, and friendship (or the lack of). More a straight mystery-suspense novel. Do not even go near The Honourable Schoolboy.

  4. The Alec Guiness TV series is better than the movie – at least the script is far more intelligent; the characters more distinct and intelligently crafted (by the writers and actors). The low budget, dowdiness of it all actually helps it in my view. The movie just seems a bit shallow after watching the TV version and, while it’s well made, that affected my enjoyment of it. The book I read ages ago and seems comparable to the TV series.

  5. I think The Tailor of Panama being decent. The hero of that novel is a cleaned-up con artist who gets blackmailed into spying by a smarmy British agent, and together they botch everything and leave a wake of destruction in innocent people’s lives. Or at least that’s how I remember it. I didn’t see the movie (starring Pierce Brosnan, I think?) but I suspect it romanticizes the protagonist a bit too much for my taste.

  6. I really liked the Le Carre book Absolute Friends, which is pretty close to being slash fanfiction about the charged friendship of an East German revolutionary and British cold war spy. That book is also really critical of the Afghan War.

    But I couldn’t finish TSWCIFTC, mainly due to the smugness you mention as well as the author’s excessive misogyny.

Comments are closed.