Let’s hear it for menstrual blood.
Radioactive spiders, super-soldier serums, shouts of “Shazam!”, they’re all second best attempts to transform puberty into the fantastical. But puberty already is fantastical. Blood spilling from your genitalia? No warning, no spider-senses tingling, just a biological transformation as instantaneous as a gamma bomb.
Stan Lee and Jack Kirby hinted at it first, when a teenage Jean Grey’s taxi pulled in front of the Xavier School for Gifted Youngster back in 1963. Later writers replaced Miss Grey’s mutant menstruation with a telekinesis-spilling car accident when she was ten (an increasingly common age for menarche, though the average is still twelve). When a teenage Rogue arrives at the School in 2000, the grown-up Dr. Grey tries to spell it out for her: “These mutations manifest at puberty and are often triggered by periods of heightened emotional stress.”
Yep, you heard right: “triggered by periods.” Even X-Men director Bryan Singer buries the horror of menstruation in the middle of the sentence. That’s why we need Stephen King. It takes a horror writer to spill the blood.
Like Jean Grey, Carrie White is a telekinetic mutant who discovers her powers at puberty. But King doesn’t beat around the proverbial bush. He puts us in the girls locker room when Carrie menstruates for the first time and bullies pelt her with tampons. “The period,” explained King in an interview, “would release the right hormones and she would rain down destruction on them.”
King’s Ewen High School in Chamberlain, Maine is far far away from Professor X’s “exclusive private school in New York’s Westchester country.” Stan and Jack’s mostly male, mostly pre-pubescent readers weren’t ready for a Jean Gray tampon scene. In 1974, when Carrie was first published, The X-Men were in reprints.
I doubt King was aware that his main character was a knock-off of Marvel’s second Silver Age superheroine. He was just trying to prove to himself that he wasn’t “scared of women” (someone had accused him of writing only about “macho things”). He typed the menstruation scene and then tossed it in his wastebasket. “I hated it,” he said. It took his wife to fish out those first three pages and bully him into writing a couple hundred more. Next thing Sissy Spacek is getting herself nominated for Best Actress.
The Brian De Palma film was still in production when Chris Claremont relaunched the X-Men in 1975. When Carrie White leapt from paper to screen the following year, Jean Grey was transforming from Marvel Girl to Phoenix. Kirby penned Jean cowering on the cover of X-Men No. 1. Lee admitted that he sometimes forgot what her powers were (he misidentifies telekinesis as “teleportation” in that first issue). But Dave Cockrum’s Phoenix explodes across X-Men No. 101, and soon Claremont makes her the most powerful mutant on earth, dwarfing even Professor X.
By 1980, Dark Phoenix is swallowing stars like air. Which says a lot about the circularity of cultural influence. It only took four years for the inspiration for Carrie to become Carrie. King’s mutant murders everyone at her prom and razes most of her hometown. Jean Grey takes out the population of an entire planet, but the result is the same: both pregnancy-ready women have to die.
Carries bleeds out from a mother-inflicted knife wound, while Jean superheroically commits suicide. Carrie’s hyper-religious mother stabs her because Mrs. White considers her own daughter an abomination against God. Which is true of Miss Grey too. Mutants are the engine turning Darwin’s God-usurping evolution. Mutations that increase the likelihood of reproduction are Naturally Selected. You might think telekinesis would be pretty damn adaptive, but it’s top two female specimens died before they reproduced. Otherwise menarche would be accompanied by more than just internal explosions.
Of course Jean and Carrie don’t stay dead for long. I’ve lost track of the number of times Jean has returned and/or been cloned. Stephen King never wrote a sequel, but his first-born mutant was resurrected for a film sequel, a stage musical, and a made-for-TV remake designed to launch a series. All were flops. So you have to admire Boys Don’t Cry director Kimberly Peirce for wading anew into all that pig and menstrual blood. She’s not scared of women either.
Carrie wasn’t her first choice for next project (the producer came to her), but when Peirce reread the novel, she realized: “Oh, these are all my issues: I deal with misfits, with what power does to people, with humiliation and anger and violence. Carrie has gone through life getting beaten up by everyone. She’s got no safe place. And then she finds telekinesis — her talent, her skill — and it becomes her refuge. And I thought, Wow, this is an opportunity to make a superhero-origin story. With her period comes the power. With adolescence comes sexuality, and with sexuality comes power.”
In other words, the best thing about Peirce’s Carrie are the vaginas. Not that we ever see one. She opens with Carrie’s home birth (the amniotic-soaked Bible on the stairs is a nice touch), but Julianne Moore’s dress hem hides everything else. I ducked my head behind the surgical screen during my wife’s c-section, but I can report that the table rocked with the doctor’s sawing and the floor required a mop afterwards. But horror movie horror is about controlling horror (usually by exaggeration) and so paradoxically lessening its effect. Peirce at least knows where the horror crawls out from.
Soon Kick-Ass actress Chloë Grace Moretz’s vagina threatens an appearance during the shower scene (with a brilliant nod to Hitchcock), and the first objects she moves with her mind are all those tampons. Then the whole movie is drenched in half-births. Carrie’s water breaks when she explodes a drinking cooler in the office of a principal scared to say the word “period.” When Carrie’s mother locks her in a womb of a closet, Carrie cracks a slit down the length of the door; an hour later Mom is midwifing herself through the bloody opening. Carrie cracks a larger slit under the car of the bully who turned her into Red Phoenix. The girl dies half-born, her crowning face caught in the vagina dentata of the bloody windshield. Carrie, like her sister Jean, finally ends her own life–though the crack in the tombstone keeps at least the vagina motif alive.
Ultimately, the new Carrie doesn’t add much to either De Palma’s or King’s, both of which at least spoke to their times (read Gloria Steinem’s Ms. essay “If Men Could Menstruate” if you’re in doubt). But the real horrors remain too much in the visual subtext (and that includes the Columbine shootings). Why not employ all the powers of CGI to show infant Carrie struggling out of the birth canal? Why not show the harrowing, bathroom stall moment when Carrie inserts her first tampon?
Metaphors are nice and all, but Carrie remains too marooned in the 70s. Or maybe our culture hasn’t really grown in those forty years. We’re still the same horrified middle schoolers cringing through Sex Ed class. We’re still scared of women.
I have been watching some of the Paranormal Activity movies (I have a soft-spot for bad horror movies), and they definitely have an anti-woman theme going through them, too – what with covens of witches being the tool for demons to get the hands on the souls of sons.
I enjoyed this piece! The herstory of women’s performance art could be a useful parallel too– Carolee Schneeman’s “Meat Joy” being just one glorious example.
@Bert: I’m tempted to say there’s no genre more anti-women than horror . . . and then I start thinking about all the other genres.
Horror is frequently sadistic, but, as many people (including our overlord Noah) have pointed out, it often upsets hierarchies (patriarchal ones included), and causes masochistic identification with victims. I tend to think of horror as among the more benign genres– comedy, action, drama, romance have their bright spots, but they aren’t premised on dealing with explicit brutality explicitly in the same way.
Yeah…even Carrie vs. Jean Grey, I think horror comes off better in terms of attitude toward women. My memory, anyway, is that you sympathize with Carrie pretty much the whole way through the DePalma film. She’s the victim of misogyny-inflected bullying throughout, there’s an analysis of how hatred of women works there, at least. Whereas with Jean Grey it really is just, oh, she’s a powerful woman, therefore genocide, pretty much.
Have you read Carol Clover’s Men, Women, and Chainsaws, Chris? It’s fantastic.
Thanks, Noah. I’ll put Clover on my to-read list.
I haven’t seen the newest Carrie yet or read the book but from what I’ve heard there seems to be one major difference between the new and old movie.
In the De Palma version, when Carrie kills everyone at the prom, she doesn’t move and appears catatonic, suggesting that she only accidental used her powers. This makes the misogyny of fundamentalist Christianity and the cruelty of peers the villains of story.
I the newer version she waves her hands around which meas she killed everyone intentionally in cold blood (ba dom tish). I don’t know if she even bothered to make sure if her date was ok first. This makes her much less sympathetic and brings up a whole lot of other issues. Specifically, it makes more sense that everyone didn’t like her is she’s really a borderline sociopath. Since the movie suggests that the audience is supposed to identify with her it also says a lot of bad things about the audience or at least the movies idea of what the audience is.
in the depalma version some of the deaths seem ambiguous. did she mean to kill the teacher or not? depalma also adds to the ambiguity by filming it subjectively. who was laughing at her and who did she just think was laughing at her? still, i’m pretty sure much of the mayhem is intended to be taken as pretty deliberate. doesn’t she cock her head and looks at each of the objects she’s manipulating (first closing the doors, the firehose also stands out).
I just watched the film this weekend so I could jump in on this, although I haven’t seen the new one. I’d say Ave hit the nail on the head with ambiguous… its ambiguous who they are laughing at, how much control Carrie has over the particulars of the bloodbath… I mean, the whole film is ambiguous. The sympathetic teacher simultaneously sympathizes with Carrie’s tormentors, Tommy’s advances to her are presented as this sort of nauseating, topsy-turvy carnival… I got the sense of Carrie having telepathic control over the massacre, but also that she was kind of an alien, which is supported by Sissy Spacek’s casting and the cinematography. She wasn’t an angry person waving her hands around hocus pocus, but beyond anger.
The new film lost that ambiguity, in part because the director saw it as a kind of superhero origin story, which typically involves the mutant gianing control of superpowers. In this case, I think that hurts the story. If telekinesis is a metaphor for menstruation and sexuality, Carrie never gains control of it. I also think the deliberateness of her attacks at the end were probably a self-conscious allusion to Columbine, which were of course fully deliberate, though potentially motived by bullying.
Chris, This would tie in really well with your thoughts in the last piece… I previously thought that the remake of Carrie was more financially motivated than anything, but it almost seems like the times demanded a remake, that addressed superheroes and school shootings more directly. From what I’ve heard, I’m unconvinced this remake sheds much light on the association of superheroics and youth violence, as much as it casually reinforces it.
I’d have to agree, Kailyn.
Speak for your self, human.
Sorry for the haters- I also got an xmen feel to this one.
i usually dislike remakes alot but this got me, and I almost want to call it XMen Origins – Carrie. but say this as well- Jean Grey had different things so the comparison is irrelevant. I love Carrie 2013, and another site is just calling her a villain (Google it) I thought it was just wrong. She isnt a villain
I agree, “villain” is way too simplistic. Her destructiveness at the end is tragic not evil. And our sympathy is with her the way Mary Shelley has us empathize with the creature in Frankenstein as he is mistreated and so turned into a monster.
I almost want to make a Patrick Stewart wheelchair ending with a colleague inviting her to the school of the gifted to get away from it all after her ordeal with the morons in her hometown. Jean Grey would be an excellent help in making her transition to mutant acceptance, from a cruel human repulsion to her experience. I think a similar visit to Charlie from Firestarter would be a good idea.