Captain America: Winter Soldier, like Dark Knight Rises before it, signals its intelligence through ambivalent allegory. In the Avengers, the supersecret SHIELD spy network is unambiguously good; the government defends our borders against a (literal) alien menace, as the spies man the ramparts. In Winter Solider, though, the spooks are the foe, as well as the heroes; America (and its security force) is its own worst enemy. Hydra lurks within SHIELD itself, working to promote terrorism in order to make the world ready and eager for totalitarian dictatorship. The terrorist other and the fascist state collude together to oppress and murder us all. End of moral.
It’s not a bad moral, as these things go. It is in fact the case that imperial excess and terrorist extremism thrive on each other; George W. and Osama, loving frenemies, birthed the big ball of hate and bile that consumed thousands of people here and hundreds of thousands overseas. Were we not gallumphing around the Middle East casually starving children and dropping the occasional bomb, who would climb into a plane and kill themselves in a futile orgy of innocent death? If terrorist whackos didn’t create a futile orgy of innocent death, what excuse would we have for picking a random, distant country and turning it into a nightmare wasteland? The pendulum of revenge needs psychopaths pushing on both sides, if it’s going to continue to reap.
Which is sort of what Winter Soldier is about, with its Hydra vs. SHIELD shenanigans…but then, not really. Because Hydra and SHIELD don’t furtively collaborate in bloodshed. Instead, Hydra is both halves of the evil dialectic; it’s both Osama, the terrorist, and George W., the totalitarian twit. Hydra creates chaos to impose imperial order. SHIELD, on the other hand, in the person of the noble Nick Fury (and of course, of Captain America), remains transcendently pure, battling anarchy and fascism in the name of an unexamined, supposedly non-ideological middle. Fury and Cap stand for decency — said decency underwritten by high-tech weaponry, martial bluster, and megaexplosions, of course. At the end Black Widow sneers at the appointed democratic representatives of the people, giving them the old, “You don’t want to know the truth” spiel, utterly without irony. We need kick ass heroes to do the dirty work of protecting us from the evil bastards who tell us they will protect us from the terrorists. America is the land of the violent, uncompromising, brutal middle.
Chris Evans as Captain America seems, then, like the perfect vacuity to paper over this empty aperture. Wooden, certain, noble, sexless, a blank, blond, slightly startled bolus of violence, pointed by the plot in more or less arbitrary directions, scattering bodies and explosions about him as he rolls like a muscle-bound marble about the screen. He is goodness sans ideology, justice sans brains, righteousness sans character. The world in its complexity is shoved into Hydra, which whispers “Hail nuance!” before it is battered into submission by the purity of himbo. America marches on, unsullied by thought, on the straight and narrow path to what we call justice for all.
But it has at least one nifty fight scene right?
The fight scenes are fine; things blow up.
Captain America: The Winter Soldier as Liberal Fantasy – A Review
Bahahaha: “Wooden, certain, noble, sexless, a blank, blond” – I am just so happy someone else said this about Chris Evans. Nice to know it’s not just me.
He seems to be a pleasant enough individual offscreen; I don’t wish him ill or anything. But he is torturous to watch.
That second paragraph is truly excellent, Noah.
Haha yes – Chris Evans as Captain America, not just Chris Evans.
So utterly disagree with you on this point, but then again that’s no surprise. :)
Apparently Evans thinks that his Captain America is a virgin, which suggests he’s a good actor inhabiting a bad character maybe? I don’t know. I’ve never seen the film. In fact, the only thing I have seen him in is Snow Piercer. I thought he was pretty good in that, though he had to deliver some pretty hokey dialogue.
Evans on Cap’s virginity:
http://www.ew.com/article/2015/04/28/avengers-age-ultron-chris-evans-wonders-%E2%80%A6-captain-america-virgin
Nick Fury would be the Obama figure, the film trying to convince us theres some big difference in the US before and after Bush…?
Not sure Fury is exactly Obama, or that it’s quite a condemnation of Bush…more like it’s condemning anarchy and totalitarianism as interlocking evils, both of which are an alien imposition on America’s true moderation.
That comment was a quick reaction, and I’d agree that you can’t really make those kind of exact analogies. But I think that “true moderation” – which makes even the most heinous actions well intentioned mistakes – is definitely a part of Obama’s image.
Democracy works at least in part on the appearance of difference, and I think theres plenty of continuity between administrations – Obama has less gung ho rhetoric than Bush but still backs death squads. So… I think we’re effectively saying the same thing?
Having since seen the film, I must confess that I haven’t really much to add, except to say that good Lord that spiel by Black Widow perfectly incapsulates how thematically obnoxious and empty the movie is. And to think, critics were hailing this as some politically poignant and apropos thriller. Ugh.
But yay, fight scenes.
I hope you didn’t watch it because of this review; I’d sort of feel bad…
Pingback: Sacred Characters and Necessary Desecrations | The Scriptors