The Best Albums of 2015

I got a couple of best of lists published this year, but I thought I’d do a definitive one here, because why not? I tried to listen to more new music this year, for reasons which are unclear, except for the usual random neurotic obsession explanation. So here are my 25 best, from least best to most best. (If there seems inconsistency with other lists I’ve posted, I invoke hobgoblins and general wishy-washy indecision.) In many cases I’ve written about the albums elsewhere, so I’ve embedded links where that’s the case.

_____

25. Jason Isbell—Something More Than Free
 

 
 
24. False—Untitled
 

 
 
23. Novella—Land
 

 
 
22. Rhiannon Giddens—Tomorrow Is My Turn
 

 
 
21.Death Grips—The Powers That B
 

 
 
20.Eartheater—RIP Chrysalis
 

 
 
19.Insect Ark—Portal/Well
 

 
 
18. Nozinja —Nozinja Lodge
 

 
 
17. Elfmilk—Relocation
 
 

 
 
16. Nicki Bluhm—Loved Wild Lost
 

 
 
15. Ballake Sissoko & Vincent Segal—Musique de Nuit
 

 
 
14. Negro Leo—Niños Heroes
 

 
 
13. Jordannah Elizabeth—A Rush
 

 
 
12. Jonny Faith—Sundial
 

 
 
11.Mugen Hoso—North Carolina Shepherd Dog
 

 
 
10.Kelela—Hallucinogen
 

 
 
9.Mbongwana Star—From Kinshasha to the Moon
 

 
 
8. Father—Who’s Gonna Get Fucked First?
 

 
 
7. Suuns and Jerusalem in My Heart
 

 
 
6.Melt Banana— Return of 13 Hedgehogs
 

 
 
5. Mastery—V.A.L.I.S.
 

 
 
4. Brandi Carlile—The Firewatcher’s Daughter
 

 
 
3. Dawn Richard—Blackheart
 

 
 
2. Sewer Goddess—Painlust
 

 
 
1. RP Boo—Fingers, Bank Pads, and Shoe Prints
 

 
 
______

I try not to get stuck in a rut on these lists, and I think this one is pretty varied. There’s metal, hip hop, indie rock, country, folk, electronica, R&B, rock, punk, funk, various kinds of world music, psychedlia, and at least one sort-of jazz thing. The lack of classical music is the big gaping genre hole, though I’m sure there are others.

It is quite US centric; I think 14 out of 25 are from the states; after that Japan is most represented with 2, and then you’ve got Brazil, South Africa, Mexico, UK, Nigeria, Canada, Australia, Mali and France. Nearly equal gender balance: 12 out of 25 are all women or female-led. Ten black performers/groups, and another four led by people of color. It still leans towards white folks, men, and the U.S., but it’s varied enough that there aren’t that many white guys from the U.S. on it. (I think the only two bands/acts entirely made up of white US guys are Mastery and Jason Isbell.)

The last few I put on here were Father and Eartheater, which I only listened to in the last week or so—and Kelela and Elfmilk I relistened to and got more into. The last one I took off the list was Lonesome Wyatt and Rachel Brooks’ album, which I decided I didn’t like quite as well as Jason Isbell’s.

I guess that’s enough nattering. If you’d like to do a music best of on HU, let me know and maybe we can do a little roundtable. And/or tell us what your favorite albums of the year are in comments.

Utilitarian Review 1/2/16

ww tied up

News

I’m going to list my favorite albums of the year on Monday; if anyone wants to write about their favorite music of the year, let me know, and we could set up a mini-roundtable. (Or not, if no one cares.)

On HU

Featured Archive Post: Samantha Meir on Tits and Clits.

Philip Smith on Donald Barthelme’s Paul Klee.

Chris Gavaler on visual sentences vs. page layout.

Robert Stanley Martin with on sale dates for comics in May/June 1951.

I list some of the favorite things I wrote this year.

A look back at the year at the Hooded Utilitarian.
 
Utilitarians Everywhere

At the Guardian I wrote about the new Grant Morrison Wonder Woman and how its true to WW’s BDSM roots.

At the Establishment I wrote about rape/revenge films and shuffling gender roles.

At Splice Today I wrote about Jon Ronson, King of the online morals police.
 
Other Links

Todd Nickerson writes about being attracted to children and why talking about that is important in combatting child rape and molestation.

Mary Emily O’Hara on the year in sex worker activism.

Angelica Jade Bastien with the case against colorblind casting.

The Year At HU

CH-snow1

This has been a strange year at HU. We’ve had by far our most traffic ever, with more than twice as many unique hits as last year, our previous high. That’s because Jacob Canfield’s post on Charlie Hebdo became a huge viral read/hate read, dwarfing even our Victorian Wire post from a while back.

Beyond that though, this year, especially the second half, has been rather quiet. I think that’s in part because I’ve been getting more writing work, and haven’t had as much time to tend to things here as I have in the past. I’m not sure what that will or won’t mean for the blog in the future, but for the moment at least we’re still rolling along. Here are some of the notable posts, roundtables, and events from our last year.

Oh, and hey, I released my book on Wonder Woman this year. We had a roundtable to celebrate. Also, you can see all reviews/interviews/other goodies from around the web here.

Chris Gavaler writes here every week on protosuperheroes…and more recently on analyzing comics layout.

Isaac Butler on Joe Sacco and dystopia.

Our roundtable on Satire and Charlie Hebdo.

Michael Carson on American Sniper as kitsch.

Em Liu on Hollywood’s real problem with the Asian male.

Osvaldo Oyola on romance comics and weird heteronormativity.

I and others have an ongoing series on the question of Can There Be a Black Superhero?

Kim O’Connor on Chris Sims and the failings of progressive comics.

Katherine Wirick on why you shouldn’t name your makeup line after OCD.

Eric Berlatsky on how continuity undermines progress in comics.

James Lamb on the impossibility of superhero diversity.

Robert Stanley Martin with an ongoing weekly series showing on sale dates of comics from the primordial ooze to the present.

We did a big Joss Whedon roundtable.

Nix 66 on the bravery (so brave!) of Laura Kipnis.

Julian Chambliss on his art project of burning the Confederate flag.

Philip Smith on 1998 and anti-Chinese violence in Indonesian comics.

Kristian Williams on apocalypse and dystopia in Fury Road.

RM Rhodes insists Heavy Metal magazine is not punk.

Kate Polak on Hannibal, Rihanna,and sexual harassment.

I wrote a bunch of posts about Quentin Tarantino.

I wrote a bunch of posts about the rape/revenge genre.

Jimmy Johnson on Narcos and imperialism.

Petar Duric on class in the Sly Cooper games.

mouse on furries and smut.

I’ve started a Patreon to support some of my writing here.

Kim O’Connor on Adrian Tomine’s weak portrayal of women.

Ng Suat Tong on Frazetta’s racism.

My Year In Writing

Every year about this time I do a roundup of the best things I’ve written over the last 365 days or so. I usually write somewhere in the neighborhood of a post a day during the year, give or take, so I probably published in the neighborhood of 350-400 pieces in 2015 (not counting writing for HU and/or work for hire.) I never remember everything I’ve done, but below are some of the pieces I was proudest of. They’re not in any particular order.

On Ursula K. Le Guin’s Always Coming Home and why utopias can’t tell a story.

On The Man in the High Castle and making America safe for Nazis.

On radical feminists and the effort to shame Laverne Cox.

A ranking of every character in every Tarantino movie (before Hateful Eight.)

On Ta-Nehisi Coates’ Between the World and Me as a work of hope.

My interview with activist Mariame Kaba about Black Lives Matter and reimagining justice.

On the documentary Hot Girls Wanted and the sadism of anti-sex work documentaries.

On how neo-Nazis try to leverage American anti-black racism against Jews.

On why we need to abandon electronic fetal monitoring.

On why indie music is so white.

On Wes Craven’s Last House on the Left.

On slave Leia as a confused vision of sexual awakening.

On soap opera tropes in Orphan Black.

How Indiana’s public policy sparked an HIV crisis.

On the boondoggle that is quality television in the golden age.

Skimming online articles rather than reading books makes you smarter.

On conservative political correctness.

Are cozies morally reprehensible?

On Rolling Stone, Eden, and how the media loves sensational stories about sex work.

How Daredevil treats torture as a virtue.

On the prejuice against male Syrian refugees.

On how I want to write for Buzzfeed.

Everybody wants to kill baby hitler.
 
So that’s the year that was. If you’ve got a favorite piece of mine that you think I missed, let me know in comments. And/or, if you have something you wrote this year, you’d like to share, please put that in comments too. Have a good new year, all!

Analyzing Comics 101: Visual Sentence vs. Page Layout

Having taught my spring term seminar Superheroes a half dozen times now, I’m converting it to one of the gateway courses for Washington and Lee students entering the English major. The overhaul means jettisoning the pre-history of the genre (I love that stuff, but I could just hand my students On the Origin of Superheroes and be done with it) and focusing much more on comics as an art medium. So I’m trying to boil down the basics, the must-know criteria for analyzing a comic book.

So now it’s time to invite Neil Cohn to the lectern. If you haven’t read his The Visual Language of Comics, please do. Meanwhile, here’s my boiling down of his visual language grammar.

Narrative panel types: images may be categorized according to the kinds of narrative information they contain and how that information creates a visual sentence when read in sequence:

Orienter: introduces context for a later interaction (no tension).

Establisher: introduces elements that later interact (no tension).

Initial: begins the interactive tension.

Prolongation: continues the interactive tension.

Peak: high point of interactive tension.

Release: aftermath of interactive tension.

Cohn only looks at comic strips, which typically express a single sentence in a linear arrangement of three or four panels, but longer graphic narratives can express multiple sentences on a single page or extend a single visual sentence over multiple pages.  To analyze the different ways that can work, I’m adding some terminology to Cohn’s.

Closed sentences: two sentences that begin and end without sharing panels.

Overlapping sentences: sentences that share panels.

Interrupted sentence: an overlapping sentence that does not complete or initiate its tension before another sentence replaces it; sentences might share an Orienter, or an Establisher may introduce two elements that do not interact until later as a form foreshadowing.

Dual-function panel: in overlapping sentences, one panel performs two narrative functions. A panel may, for example, serve as the Release of one sentence and also the Orienter, Establisher, or Initial of the next. Or an Orienter may  serve as the Establisher of an interrupted sentence that initializes tension later.

Sentence Layout: the relationship of visual sentences to pages.

Page sentence: a sentence that begins with the page’s first panel and ends with the page’s final panel.

Multipage sentence: a sentence that extends beyond one page.

End stop: a page and a visual sentence end simultaneously.

Enjambed: a page ends before the visual sentence ends, also called a visual cliff-hanger.

This is all awfully abstract, so let me give specific examples from The Walking Dead again.

Robert Kirkman and Tony Moore like enjambment. Their first issue includes several cliff-hangers. The bottom row of page five begins with an Establisher (introducing the door to the already established figure of Rick), is followed by an Initial panel (Rick removes the piece of wood holding the door closed), and ends with a Peak (Rick is opening the door).

http://s13.postimage.org/5yqbguo7r/image.jpg

But the Release only appears after turning to page six. That full-page panel is also a dual-function panel because it serves as the Establisher (introducing the zombies to the already established Rick) for the next, overlapping sentence.

http://s13.postimage.org/osc4dumfr/image.jpg

The turn from page nine to ten is similar. The first panel in the bottom row of page nine is an Establisher (Rick and the bicycle), followed by the page-ending Peak of Rick’s shocked reaction. The top of page ten provides the Release (we finally see what he sees).

http://s13.postimage.org/5sh7ri4gn/image.jpg

 http://s13.postimage.org/548d8k5qv/image.jpg

A similar grammatical pattern repeats on pages thirteen and fourteen. The first panel in the bottom row of thirteen is an Orienter. The second is an Establisher (Rick’s face seems to be reacting to something, a sound presumably), and the last panel is an Initial. Turn the page, and there’s the Peak.

http://s9.postimage.org/5ejovcyn3/image.jpg

http://s9.postimage.org/aeh53b49r/image.jpg

The visual grammar also shows that cliff-hangers only work on the final panel of a two-page spread, in order to prevent a reader’s eye from skimming to the critical image prematurely (which happens in my arrangements above).

Also, Moore and Kirkman don’t always enjamb their visual sentences. Page one, for instance, ends on a Peak. The page also begins with an Initial, followed by four Prolongation panels. Page one is a complete page sentence, both beginning and ending on a single page.  

http://s13.postimage.org/q0zzzhedz/image.jpg

Instead of a Release, the next page begins with an Orienter (Rick in his hospital room) for the next visual sentence, which does not overlap.

http://s13.postimage.org/9r9twl3pz/image.jpg

In terms of interrupted sentences, page ten begins a new visual sentence with the top Establisher (introducing the bicycle zombie to the already established Rick), followed by two Initials (Rick and the zombie interact) in the second. The bottom row begins with two Prolongations, followed by a Peak (Rick’s tear) and a Release (the zombie closes its mouth).

http://s13.postimage.org/548d8k5qv/image.jpg

The visual sentence appears to have ended when the next page begins a new sentence with no further interaction between Rick and the zombie. So page ten reads as a complete page sentence, until the bottom of page twenty-three continues the interaction with a Prolongation panel, retroactively showing that the visual sentence was interrupted.

http://s9.postimage.org/5fy82ipun/image.jpg

Page twenty-four provides a new Peak (Rick shoots the zombie), followed by two Release panels (Rick looking down, the zombie with a bullet hole in its forehead).

http://s9.postimage.org/54grpr9en/image.jpg

Rick’s tear is also a Prolongation of his tear on page ten, an additional overlapping sentence that reaches its Peak in the next panel when Rick wipes the tear away. The final three panels are Releases. They’re also their own overlapping, three-panel sentence: Initial (Rick and the car), Peak (Rick gets into the car), and Release (car has driven off).

 

Paul Klee Misplaces an Aircraft

Klee_1922_Senecio_PLZ-167

 
I first encountered Donald Barthleme by way of The New Yorker Fiction podcast where I heard an excellent reading of his story “I Bought a Little City”. I consequently set about devouring everything of his I could find. He now holds a secure place in my pantheon of favourite writers, wedged somewhere between Richard McGuire and P. G. Woodehouse.

One has the sense when reading Barthleme’s work of the empirical and the insane being held in tight proximity to one another. In his handling of form Barthleme can be highly precise on both the sentence and story level. He had a background in architecture, which perhaps lent him a drive toward the empirical. At the same time, within and around this precisely measured prose, Barthelme’s writing is often experimental, and chaotic. One of his stories, for example, is a single perfectly correct sentence which runs for several pages. His protagonists, similarly, in perfectly rational terms contained within a perfectly rational structure, display extremes of emotional instability and indulge in behavior which borders upon insanity.

One of my favourite Barthleme stories (of which there are many) is “Engineer-Private Paul Klee Misplaces an Aircraft between Milbertshofen and Cambrai, March 1916”. The story is a meager two and a half pages of prose which detail, as the title suggests, the disappearance of an aircraft. Exactly how or why the aircraft in question has come to be misplaced is never explained. This, for me, epitomizes Barthleme’s brilliance – for an aircraft to vanish is implausible (they are large and thus hard to misplace), and yet the fact of not seeing the thing one expects to see – the thing one could have sworn was there a moment ago, the rising panic as one realises that one will be tasked with providing an explanation for an error which remains beyond one’s own understanding – feels very familiar.

The disappearance of the plane is described alternately by the eponymous Paul Klee, and by the Secret Police, who have been watching him. The title and the style of the prose suggests the exacting empiricism of an inquest. The Secret Police prove to be equally baffled by the aircraft’s disappearance as Klee, however. Indeed, the Secret Police are less concerned about the missing aircraft or apportioning blame and far more concerned about their own loneliness, which borders upon existential dread. ‘There is a secret sigh that we sigh, secretly’ The Secret Police say. ‘We yearn to be known, acknowledged, admired even.’ When Paul Klee decides to alter the manifest, thereby hiding his error, the Secret Police applaud this decision, adding ‘[w]e would like to embrace him as a comrade and brother but unfortunately we are not embraceable.’

Barthleme speaks to me because he has little truck with power. His sympathy is not with those who demand explanations, but with the poor souls caught in the business of being human. He embraces the ways in which rational structures, be they literary, legal, or political, can contain and even exacerbate those volatile and emotionally-charged elements which would appear to be their antitheses. We often view madness and marginalisation as connected – that madness disqualifies one from holding any kind of power. Indeed, it is many a lazy writer who makes an antagonist or clown ‘crazy’ in order to discourage examination or viewer empathy. Barthleme shows us, however, that those individuals who have apparent power – soldiers protecting nuclear missiles, teachers, billionaires, the secret service – are just as ‘mad’ as the powerless. Indeed, Paul Klee seems to suffer far less than the individuals who police him – he likes to draw, he eats chocolate, he has a romantic partner, whereas the ‘omniscient’ Secret Police just want to be loved.

Barthleme also appeals to me because he realises that human beings are ridiculous. For Barthleme, above and within the humdrum of the everyday is a palpable turmoil, where the decisions made by the hegemony seem to be founded upon eminently non-empirical motivations. What separates Barthleme from the Kafkas of the world is his pathos. All of his characters, even the most unhinged and dangerous, seem to be palpably human, and Barthleme, if he does not love them for it, at least allows them to exist as they are without judgment. The Secret Police, like so many of Barthleme’s characters, stagger under the weight of a power they are utterly unsuited to wield. They do not realise it, but their power and their sorrow are deeply imbricated. Barthelme does not hate the Secret Police – he wants to throw a blanket over their shoulders and tell them that everything is going to be okay. Their ridiculousness is protected and even facilitated by the unbending structures which surround them. Humanity, perfectly broken as it is, endures through chaos in Barthleme’s works. Aircraft vanish, careers come under peril, nuclear warheads are guarded by maniacs, cities are purchased by love-sick tyrants, and yet, as Paul Klee says ‘drawings and chocolate go on forever.’

Utilitarian Review 12/26/15

the-hateful-eight-samuel-l-jackson

 
On HU

Short week this time out because of the holiday.

Featured Archive Post: Richard Cook with a history of Storm in covers.

Me on Charles Dickens fan fiction and how fan fic and criticism and art are all the same.

Chris Gavaler looks at panels and framing in comics.

Robert Stanley Martin with on sales dates of comics from March and April 1951.
 
Utilitarians Everywhere

At Playboy

— I ranked every character in Quentin Tarantino’s movies. 16000+ words for 183 characters.

—I had a list of this year’s biggest whitewashing casting controversies.

At the Guardian I wrote about

—erasing the lesbian origins of the Bechdel test.

casting a black Hermione and the confused racial themes of Harry Potter.

At Quartz I wrote about race in Hateful Eight.

At Random Nerds I wrote about the Last Days of Ms. Marvel and apocalypse from the margins.

At the Los Angeles Times I wrote about this year in outrage.

At Splice Today I wrote about

—the three best country albums of 2015.

best of lists and the marketing machine.